Chiang Mai massage parlour submitting defamation over ‘distorted’ molestation declare

An escalating spat over alleged sexual molestation at a therapeutic massage parlour in Chiang Mai‘s Wualai district has taken a new twist. The accused masseuse, together with the proprietor of the institution, retaliated, submitting a police criticism towards the younger male consumer and the creator of the Facebook publish that spurred the initial allegation. They declare the online account was a distortion of the particular events, inflicting injury to their business status.
On July 7, a post appeared on Facebook stating that a younger man had been sexually assaulted by a transgender masseuse whereas availing of a traditional Thai massage. The client, based on the publish, took offence and responded by kicking the masseuse within the face. The submit claimed the therapeutic massage owner had refused to accept responsibility, instead advising the complainant to report the matter to the police.
The report hinged primarily on the accusation of molestation as the massage parlour lacked CCTV cameras to provide concrete evidence. In addition, the supposed sufferer had sought damage compensation amounting to 1,000 baht (US$28). Following a media report, the incident garnered vital public consideration.
Addressing the state of affairs today, the 38 12 months old masseuse Piphat and the spa owner introduced themselves to the Chiang Mai City Police investigators. They lodged a report in opposition to the page owner and the younger man behind the disputed Facebook story, claiming that it distorted the truth, leading to loss and injury to their status, reported KhaoSod.
Piphat denied the molestation allegations, explaining that the customer had are out there in for an oil massage with his girlfriend ready behind a separating curtain. Around half-hour into the session, the shopper suddenly attacked Piphat, accusing him of inappropriate behaviour, and thereafter demanding compensation of 1,000 baht. Piphat and the parlour proprietor refused to compensate as they have been convinced of no wrongdoing on their half.
The events later met at the police station to determine information and talk about a possible settlement. While Authoritative purported victim confessions about assaulting Piphat have been obvious, no proof of current harassment was presented. Consequently, the events agreed to settle the assault matter with a compensation of 1,000 baht and an apology. However, the complainants reportedly proceeded to unfold distorted information on social media, contradicting their previous settlement.
Piphat, with over six years of impeccable service within the masseuse occupation, vehemently denied any misconduct claims. Their preliminary consult with police instructed shifting forward with costs of physical harm given the opponent’s refusal to accept liability despite being at fault. They had been also considering filing further complaints for continuous status damages..

Leave a Comment