Thai couple demands justice from online vendor after failing to claim 30 million baht lottery jackpot

A Thai couple lodged a formal criticism in opposition to an online lottery vendor for his or her failure to ship a set of profitable lottery tickets, ensuing in the couple’s unfortunate loss of a 30 million baht jackpot.
On October 2, a 37 12 months outdated Thai girl, Nareerat Phanphamorn, posted on Facebook that she had gained the lottery jackpot however was unable to assert the money because she had bought the tickets from a web-based store and the shop proprietor had not delivered the tickets to her.
Nareerant connected a picture of 5 lottery tickets bearing the quantity 727202 to the submit, which was the first prize within the lottery draw held on Sunday, October 1. Each of those tickets was valued at 6 million baht, making her the rightful winner of a 30 million baht jackpot. Nareerat mentioned within the caption…

“It is inside my attain. Let’s see if I can attain it or not. The store didn’t give me the tickets.”

The lady and her 60 12 months outdated husband, Kiat Liamsuwan, gave an interview to ThaiRath about the issue yesterday. Nareerat mentioned she had already filed a criticism in opposition to the net store owner at Taluk Doo Police Station in the central province of Uthai Thani.
Nareerat defined that her husband was the one who purchased the lottery tickets. They went to a well-known temple to pray for fortunate numbers. They performed a fortune-telling exercise with Chinese fortune sticks and both received the identical quantity, 20.
Nareerat stated her husband decided to purchase lottery tickets from a web-based vendor on September 23, which was a primary for him. He requested the net vendor to search out him the tickets with the quantity 202, and the shop offered him 5 tickets with the number 727202. Five tickets cost him 720 baht and he asked for fee on delivery.
Cash on delivery, missed calls

The couple thought the tickets could be delivered before the lottery announcement on October 1 however they never received them. They then checked the tickets they’d purchased through chat with the shop and found that every one five tickets had gained the jackpot.
They mentioned that they asked the online vendor whether or not they had delivered the tickets to them, as they initially thought it was a supply company error. However, the seller replied that that they had not delivered the tickets to them as a end result of Kiat had not picked up the telephone.
Kiat checked his missed calls historical past and found nothing. Kiat was curious if the shop was deliberately keeping the jackpot lottery tickets. However, he had not but paid for the tickets as he had requested money on supply, so he was unsure if he was entitled to them.
The online lottery vendor later announced on its Facebook page that the store did not deliver the tickets to Kiat because he did not answer his telephone in the course of the supply time. The delivery service was unable to gather the cash from the shop so the tickets had been returned to the store.
The vendor added that Kiat contacted the shop after the lottery end result was introduced. However, the seller has a rule that customers can solely contact the store earlier than 4pm on the day of the lottery.
A Thai lawyer, Nithikorn Kaewto, gave his opinion on the matter, saying that the lottery tickets should belong to Kiat as a end result of the sale and payment contract had already been completed even when Kiat had not but paid for them. The lawyer advised Kiat to sue the store proprietor for embezzlement.
Quick vu

This is not the primary time two events have fought over the ownership of a lottery jackpot. A dispute between a Thai instructor named Preecha Kraikuan and a policeman named Jaroon Wimon kicked off one of the greatest property disputes in Thailand.
Preecha accused Jaroon of misappropriating the successful lottery ticket and filed a lawsuit towards Jaroon. Jaroon insisted that he had purchased the tickets himself and at last, after 5 years of defending himself, received the case in opposition to Preecha.
Follow more of The Thaiger’s latest stories on our new Facebook web page HERE..

Leave a Comment